Insurers should not have to pay for banks' mistakes, says CEA
Register for a trial Please sign in to read the full content of this article. If you aren’t already a subscriber, you can register for a free one-month trial.
CEA faults EC tax proposals
08 October 2010
Published in: Regulation, Accounting - tax
Companies: CEA
Sign in
To access the premium content on InsuranceERM, you must first sign in to your account
Aren’t a subscriber? Register for a free one-month trial now.
Highlights
- Solvency II data could cost big insurers over £100m
- Zurich's ERM: setting the tone from the top
- FSA highlights weaknesses in insurers' models
- Majority of insurers lag on Solvency II reporting requirements
- Milliman hires Dunn from KPMG
- Danes keen to enforce 2014 Solvency II deadline
- How Solvency II will affect insurers' bond and equity investments
- Solvency II will hit securitisations but may boost derivatives' use
- Compliance costs put financial institutions off overseas ventures
- Model validation consortium launched
- Further disputes remain likely over matching premiums fudge
- Encoding the directive: XBRL for Solvency II reporting
- Hybrid debt market crimped by Solvency II uncertainties
- Solvency II extra year is vital for Spain
- Using least squares Monte Carlo for Solvency II proxy modelling
- French insurers shy away from internal models
- Recognise importance of tax in pillar 1
- Sweden's insurers struggle to get ready for Solvency II
- Reducing uncertainty with multiple catastrophe models
Copyright © Field Gibson Media Ltd 2012