Archive

  • IAIS reviews priorities in response to Covid-19 crisis

    27 March 2020

    Timelines for projects will be adjusted

  • IAIS urges supervisors to "remain vigilant" of big data risk

    20 March 2020

    Take a multi-stakeholder approach, says supervisory association

  • IAIS launches ICS 2.0 level 2 texts

    16 March 2020

    Latest document contains more details than level 1

  • French insurers say "non" to Insurance Capital Standard

    11 February 2020

    Eight re/insurers decline to participate in testing of global capital measure

  • Keep TCFD recommendations voluntary, says Insurance Europe

    06 February 2020

    Lobby group responds to IAIS climate disclosure paper

  • Hong Kong insurers at odds with global peers on data benefits

    24 December 2019

    Asian Insurance Forum delegates disagree with IAIS annual meeting delegates in audience poll

  • IAIS reveals 80% of insurers 'fail' on climate disclosure

    19 December 2019

    A survey of nearly 1,200 insurers finds low awareness of TCFD climate recommendations

  • IAIS Abu Dhabi: Why the Treasury and NAIC returned different ICS conclusions

    19 November 2019

    "Team USA" voiced wildly divergent tones in their reaction to the ICS talks in Abu Dhabi last week. But, despite their strong statements, the US negotiators appear to be in accordance over zero implementation of IAIS's capital accord and the potential to move forward with compromise. Sarfraz Thind reports

  • IAIS Abu Dhabi: compromise on global capital standard keeps process on track

    14 November 2019

    Paul Walsh summarises the reaction to today’s agreements that keep the Insurance Capital Standard on track, but not without objections from Canada and questions about US comparability

  • IFRS 17: what insurers dislike from the final consultation

    24 October 2019

    The treatment of reinsurance accounting under IFRS 17 appears to be the most consistent complaint from re/insurers, but deciding when the standard should take effect continues to generate disagreements among stakeholders. Cintia Cheong reports